vera-tools.org — curated Claude Code skills, AI workflow tools, and human–AI collaboration frameworks for bio/pharma R&D: data (biostatistician, bioinformatician, machine learning engineer), clinical research, pre-clinical work, and medical writing.

For the PhD who entered industry at 30+

Late, not behind.

Human–AI collaboration frameworks for late-start scientists in biotech, pharma, and clinical research. The mentor–mentee R&D system is being replaced by a mentor–AI system. Decompose your work, architect the workflow your team runs inside, stay essential. No SaaS slop, no AI hype.

"Your domain expertise is the moat. The job is to architect the workflow that puts it in front of every decision."

Built here

All plugins →

First-party plugins and skills published by Vera, demonstrating the architect thesis in working code. The plugins are multi-skill bundles; the skills below are individual installable workflows for clinical trial design and indication research.

Pharma R&D skills

Recent guides

All guides →
Defend 11 min read

The H-1B PhD's risk arsenal: layoff-proofing inside your 60-day grace period

A layoff on H-1B status gives you 60 days. Here is a structured risk management framework for the first two weeks — and the open-source tools that reduce friction at every step.

Read →
Data Defend 9 min read

MS in bioinformatics / DS → industry: the AI-augmented job-search workflow

A 90-day plan for MS graduates pivoting from research-adjacent roles into industry data science, ML engineering, or applied bioinformatics. Concrete tools, concrete sequence, no motivational filler.

Read →
Data Clinical Decompose 9 min read

Your dissertation is a moat. Your job is to stop hiding it.

Most PhDs entering industry bury their research experience in two lines at the bottom of a resume. This is the wrong approach. Here's how to package dissertation depth as visible, priceable expertise.

Read →
Data Decompose 7 min read

You don't need a PhD to be a moat. Here's the MS playbook.

MS holders are routinely under-priced — by themselves and the market. The 18 months you spent specializing are not a watered-down PhD. They are a different instrument. Here's how to use it.

Read →
Decide 8 min read

Late-start technical professionals are not behind. Here's the math.

If you finished your PhD at 31, you are not five years behind your peers. You are five years deeper into a moat they will spend the next decade trying to dig. Here's why the conventional framing is wrong — and what to do with the correct one.

Read →